Climate damage claims impacting mortgages and insurance consumers
The application of AI to weather disaster coverage and claims is creating problems for mortgage lenders, not just claimants, according to policyholder advocates who addressed the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) at its summer conference August 12.
Claimants also need to be protected against predatory roofing contractors, they said. NAIC’s climate task force is looking at ways to protect insurance consumers, officials said during the session.
Amy Bach, executive director, United Policyholders.
“AI has a lot of value. I hope to see it being used by insurers to identify fraud,” said Amy Bach, executive director of United Policyholders, addressing NAIC’s Consumer Liaison Committee. “Right now, it feels like it’s being used very much as a sword against the consumer. Insurers have to be required to support deductibles at the point of sale and the deck page as a specific dollar amount, not a percentage, so people really understand what kind of cash they’re going to have to come up with if their roof is damaged.”
Roofs are integral to the value and security of houses, so insurance policies with roofing coverage rules that reduce coverage or do not pay the full cost of repair or replacement affect more than just homeowners, but also mortgage lenders, Bach explained.
“Once roofs are damaged, it’s very, very important to prevent further damage, to maintain home values, to keep insured collateral for the mortgage in good shape,” Bach said. “Coverage reductions have gone too far. We all know about what happens when mortgage backed securities are undervalued or overvalued, and what that can mean to our economy.”
Brent Walker, director of government relations, Coalition Against Insurance Fraud.
A home insurance policyholder can suffer twice, explained Brent Walker, director of government relations at the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud. “The consumer can be victimized twice, once by the weather event, the loss of their home or damage to their home, and then twice by predatory fraudsters,” he said. “There are plenty of honest contractors, but we will want to focus on the ones that see this as an opportunity to commit fraud.”
When Hurricane Debby struck Florida earlier this month, the state deployed its Disaster Fraud Action Strike Teams, under the authority of the state’s chief financial officer, Jimmy Patronis. CAIF’s Walker took note of this action, and suggested leveraging it to better support insurance consumers.
“They went door to door. They shared information with homeowners. They met with emergency management officials and local officials, and they were visible,” he said. “Those are excellent. Is there any way that we can measure that those messages are being received by the consumers and predictable? That has been the question for many, many years. How do you measure the prevention of fraud? That’s a very, very, very hard question to answer.”
California insurance commissioner Ricardo Lara, who co-chairs NAIC’s Climate and Resiliency Task Force, stated that the group is working on a toolkit for state insurance commissioners and their departments to combine information and make clear “what are the first things you need to look at in terms of protecting consumers after a natural catastrophe,” he said. “Just as consumers need to be aware, so do commissioners and departments.”
