2022 Car and Driver EV of the Year: The Contenders
This is happening. Just a few years ago, you’d find a desultory Tesla or Chevy Bolt at our 10Best testing, usually plugged in while the rest of the vehicles cycled in and out of the lot. Now there are enough EVs to warrant their own showdown. And that happened quickly. The EV shopper can choose from pickups, SUVs, and sedans, some courtesy of entirely new companies. Charging is getting faster and easier to find, if not easier to get working. At least two new models, the Rivian R1S and Cadillac Lyriq, were launched the same week as our event. Many more are on the way.
Eventually, whether in 10 years or 20, all cars will be electrified, and staging an EV-specific contest will be like choosing the best tires made of rubber. Right now, though, we’re at an inflection point—EVs are still a small fraction of the overall market, but a staggering 40 percent of the new-car launches we covered last year were for battery-powered vehicles. The momentum is building, so we figure now’s the time to weigh in and prod and nudge the manufacturers to build the kind of stuff we like to drive.
And there’s plenty to celebrate here—among our fleet of contenders, we had two vehicles with at least 1000 horsepower and two others with more than 800 horses. Our EV-only parking lot included both the quickest production Ford F-150 and one of the quickest Volvos ever built. We had funky frunks, concept-car interiors, and vehicles that can send power to your house, or campsite, or each other. EVs are unleashing a wave of design and engineering creativity unseen since the advent of the car itself.
Just like internal-combustion cars, though, some EVs are better than others. But only one of our 20 contenders is great enough to earn the title of EV of the Year.
Porsche Taycan 4S Cross Turismo • BMW i4 M50 • Ford Mustang Mach-E GT • Chevrolet Bolt EV/EUV • Hyundai Kona Electric • Ford F-150 Lightning Platinum • Rivian R1T Launch Edition • Audi e-tron GT • Lucid Air Grand Touring • GMC Hummer EV Pickup • Genesis GV60 Performance • Mercedes-AMG EQS 4Matic+ • Genesis Electrified G80 • BMW iX xDrive50 • Kia EV6 Wind AWD • Volvo C40 Recharge • Tesla Model S Plaid • Cadillac Lyriq 450E Debut Edition
Porsche Taycan 4S Cross Turismo
A great car that happens to be electric.
Michael SimariCar and Driver
Given the right circumstances, one could convince a Taycan 4S Cross Turismo passenger that the car isn’t an EV. It drives like a good car should: crisp controls, taut body motions, and the ability to wow with 60 mph never more than 3.5 seconds away. Even the uninitiated can feel Porsche’s chassis prowess through the supportive buckets. Which is great, because in a world of character-free electric motors, the chassis is even more important to a fulfilling driving experience. Add that this wagon’s rear-axle motor gets an EV-exclusive (well, shared with Audi) two-speed automatic and that its 800-volt architecture enables very fast DC charging, and what’s not to love? The Taycan Sport and Cross Turismo variants fall short only in value. The Cross Turismo 4S we had cost more than $130,000, but its interior materials are shaded by cars costing tens of thousands of dollars less. Cost is an age-old Porsche problem, and as far as we’re concerned, it’s this car’s only problem.
Specifications
Base/As Tested: $111,650/$136,370
Combined Power: 562 hp
Combined Torque: 479 lb-ft
Battery: 83.7 kWh
Onboard Charger: 11.0 kW
Transmissions, F/R: direct-drive/2-speed automatic
Curb Weight: 5197 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 3.5 sec
1/4-Mile: 11.8 sec @ 121 mph
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec.
Top Speed (gov ltd): 153 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 161 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.88 g
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
• Combined: 75 MPGe
• Range: 215 mi
BMW i4 M50
A modern Bimmer that should reassure the brand faithful.
Michael SimariCar and Driver
After the Festival of Weirdness that we know as the BMW i3, you’d be forgiven for assuming that the i4, an all-electric 4-series Gran Coupe, would somehow fall flat, and the electrified future would leave BMW enthusiasts behind. You’d also be flat wrong.
When we first tested the dual-motor BMW i4 M50, we were shocked (pun fully intended) by how quick it was—M3 Competition quick, in fact. We pushed it hard on challenging roads, and its suspension, steering, and brakes were not just fully up to the task; the low center of gravity and ungodly power delivery of the dual-motor electric powertrain made it even more rewarding to drive. Several staffers quietly remarked that they’d rank it above any of the 2-/3-/4-series gassers coming out of Bavaria. The rear-drive i4 eDrive40 is no slouch, either. Its single rear motor means it’s less powerful, but it’s quicker than the 430i Gran Coupe. And it throws shade in Tesla’s direction with a 301-mile EPA range, more than the rear-drive Model 3.
The best part may be the affordability of the thing. Sure, the M50 costs $7700 more than its gasoline equivalent, the M440i Gran Coupe. And yes, the eDrive40 is $10,200 more than its counterpart, the 430i. But both i4s narrow the gap with a $7500 tax credit, and even if you don’t qualify or can’t fold that into a lease, the i4 siblings are absolutely worth the premium.
Specifications
Base/As Tested: $66,895/$82,820
Combined Power: 536 hp
Combined Torque: 586 lb-ft
Battery: 81.5 kWh
Onboard Charger: 11.0 kW
Transmissions: direct-drive
Curb Weight: 5084 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 3.3 sec
1/4-Mile: 11.7 sec @ 120 mph
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec.
Top Speed (gov ltd): 128 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 149 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.96 g
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
• Combined: 80 MPGe
• Range: 227 mi
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT
The electric pony puts more spring in its step.
Marc UrbanoCar and Driver
Adorned with the GT badge, the Ford Mustang Mach-E doubles down on its pony-car impersonation. However, instead of a heart-pounding V-8, the performance-oriented electric SUV has a 91.0-kWh battery (88.0 in ’21 models) and an all-wheel-drive powertrain making 480 horsepower and 600 pound-feet of torque—634 with the $6000 Performance package (which also brings adaptive dampers, stickier tires, and more). Even without the pricey upgrade, the GT galloped to 60 mph in 4.3 seconds and to 100 mph in 11.9 seconds. That’s quicker than any regular Mach-E, but its driving demeanor isn’t discernibly different. Plus, the GT’s $61,000 base price is notably higher, and its 270-mile EPA-estimated range is slightly shorter than the non-GT AWD (we saw 250 miles in our 75-mph highway test). Mostly, the Mach-E GT endears itself to EV enthusiasts seeking Tesla-rivaling acceleration without the Tesla-esque fanaticism. The electric Stang looks stylish, is fun to drive, and boasts a spacious interior. And that’s all true with or without the GT badge.
Specifications
Base/As Tested: $61,000/$63,885
Combined Power: 480 hp
Combined Torque: 600 lb-ft
Battery: 88.0 kWh
Onboard Charger: 10.5 kW
Transmissions: direct-drive
Curb Weight: 4967 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 4.3 sec
1/4-Mile: 13.0 sec @ 104 mph
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.
Top Speed (gov ltd): 124 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 176 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.83 g
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
• Combined: 84 MPGe
• Range: 270 mi
Chevrolet Bolt EV/EUV
Sensible shoes, in sizes small and schmedium.
Andi HedrickCar and Driver
The Chevrolet Bolt EV and Bolt EUV—a new-for-2022 SUV-like variant—are the sensible shoes of the EV world. Neither will blow your socks off with face-melting acceleration, and they don’t draw attention with flashy styling or gimmicky tech. While the Bolt duo’s appearance may get them mistaken for gas-powered economy cars, they succeed as strait-laced, practical commuter cars, with solid range, decent dynamics, and very attractive pricing.
The 200-hp electric motor mounted on the front axle provides adequate oomph, allowing the EV and EUV to hit 60 mph in 6.6 and 6.8 seconds, respectively. The driving experience won’t make you search out twisty country roads, but the steering is accurate, and the tight turning radius is a boon in parking lots. The Bolt EUV can cover 190 highway miles at a steady 75 mph, but the battery better maintains its state of charge in the city, where its one-pedal driving mode recuperates energy on congested streets. Plus, the infotainment system is simple to use, with clear, crisp graphics and buttons and knobs for the most important functions. See? Practical.
For 2022, price is a bit of a sticking point—starting at $32,495 for the EV and $34,495 for the EUV, they can be optioned to $40,000, where they begin to compete with more polished and exciting electrics. But come 2023, Chevy’s slashing the Bolt EV’s base price to $26,595, with the EUV at $28,195, making the Bolt duo an enticing play in an increasingly expensive car market.
Specifications (EV)
Base/As Tested: $32,495/$37,160
Power: 200 hp
Torque: 266 lb-ft
Battery: 65.0 kWh
Onboard Charger: 11.5 kW
Transmission: direct-drive Curb Weight: 3597 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 6.6 sec
1/4-Mile: 15.1 sec @ 93 mph
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.
Top Speed (gov ltd): 93 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 185 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.79 g
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
• Combined: 120 MPGe
• Range: 259 mi
Specifications (EUV)
Base/As Tested: $34,495/$43,995
Power: 200 hp
Torque: 266 lb-ft
Battery: 65.0 kWh
Onboard Charger: 11.5 kW Transmission: direct-drive
Curb Weight: 3779 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 6.8 sec
1/4-Mile: 15.3 sec @ 92 mph
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.
Top Speed (gov ltd): 93 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 186 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.79 g
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
• Combined: 115 MPGe
• Range: 247 mi
Hyundai Kona Electric
A low-key EV that nails the basics.
Marc UrbanoCar and Driver
While the more advanced and extroverted Hyundai Ioniq 5 overshadows the Kona Electric, there’s no reason to ignore the latter EV. The electrified Kona boasts a competitive EPA range of 258 miles, and we saw 210 miles in our 75-mph highway test. With a $35,295 base price, it’s also one of the least expensive EVs, although our top-of-the-line Kona Electric Limited was $43,990 as tested. Despite fancier features and tech, we’d avoid the upcharge since it doesn’t affect the Kona’s driving demeanor or powertrain. A front-mounted 201-hp electric motor shoots the subcompact SUV to 60 mph in 6.2 seconds—1.1 ticks quicker than the sporty-adjacent Kona N Line. The electric one feels enjoyably nimble, too, and its paddle-adjustable regenerative braking is fun and functional. Too bad its fast-charging speed is capped at 100 kilowatts. Its cabin environs also could be nicer. Still, the Kona Electric is a deserving entry point into the EV lifestyle.
Specifications
Base/As Tested: $35,295/$43,990
Power: 201 hp
Torque: 291 lb-ft
Battery: 64.0 kWh
Onboard Charger: 7.2 kW
Transmission: direct-drive
Curb Weight: 3753 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 6.2 sec
1/4-Mile: 14.7 sec @ 97 mph
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.
Top Speed (gov ltd): 108 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 185 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.81 g
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
• Combined: 120 MPGe
• Range: 258 mi
Ford F-150 Lightning Platinum
Ford’s electric pickup for the masses.
Marc UrbanoCar and Driver
The F-150 Lightning is a workhorse designed as much for productivity as for converting fence-sitters into the EV fold. Its crew-cab layout and straightforward (if eerily quiet) interior shout conventional F-150. Its 10,000-pound max tow rating (8500 as tested), numerous electrical outlets, frunk, and cargo bed arm it for a litany of tasks. It drives with the rudimentary charm of Ford’s longtime bestseller, despite a model-specific independent rear suspension. Yet the optional 131.0-kWh battery supplies front and rear motors with up to 580 horsepower, resulting in a tire-squawking 4.0-second run to 60 mph. Range tops out at 320 miles per the EPA (300 as tested), though on the highway we saw only 230 miles in an unladen Platinum model. Similarly misleading, its $41,769 base price jumps to $74,419 if you want the full-zoot powertrain. Still, on the path to an electric future, the Lightning is a familiar face.
Specifications
Base/As Tested: $92,669/$93,609
Combined Power: 580 hp
Combined Torque: 775 lb-ft
Battery: 131.0 kWh
Onboard Charger: 19.2 kW
Transmissions: direct-drive
Curb Weight: 6855 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 4.0 sec
1/4-Mile: 12.7 sec @ 107 mph
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.
Top Speed (gov ltd): 110 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 180 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.77 g
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
• Combined: 66 MPGe
• Range: 300 mi
Rivian R1T Launch Edition
A truck like no other.
Marc UrbanoCar and Driver
If we had an award for the vehicle that breaks the most new ground, the Rivian R1T pickup would easily be our pick. And that’s before considering its four electric motors, which enable near-supercar hole shots. Clever functionality abounds, with thoughtful features that feel fresh next to the benchmarked sameness that often plagues traditional pickups. The R1T takes advantage of new storage spots afforded by the packaging of an EV powertrain. However, Rivian unfortunately aped some of Tesla’s fussiness, such as steering-wheel buttons to control both mirror and steering-column adjustments. This latest R1T went considerably farther than a previous model we drove on our 75-mph highway range test. It also rode more firmly on the largest (22-inch) wheel-and-tire option. The R1T’s smaller-than-full-size dimensions make the truck more maneuverable, easier to park, and more likely to fit in your garage, but they also result in a back seat that’s less than generous. Although the Rivian missed the top spot in our voting, we continue to be impressed.
Specifications
Base/As Tested: $86,075/$93,100
Combined Power: 835 hp
Combined Torque: 908 lb-ft
Battery: 128.9 kWh
Onboard Charger: 11.5 kW
Transmissions: direct-drive
Curb Weight: 7036 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 3.0 sec
1/4-Mile: 11.5 sec @ 111 mph
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec.
Top Speed (gov ltd): 111 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 176 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.84 g
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
• Combined: 70 MPGe
• Range: 314 mi
Audi e-tron GT
A pricey sports sedan that prizes performance.
Michael SimariCar and Driver
Audi’s approach for the e-tron GT sedan follows the same path as the e-tron mid-size SUV. The four-ring brand set out to make this EV look and feel just like the Audi sports sedans we know and love, much as the e-tron apes Audi’s conventional gas-powered crossovers. But a sports sedan is a whole lot more exciting than a luxury SUV, and the 522-hp e-tron GT wowed us with its low-slung shape, accurate steering, and prodigious thrust. (There’s an even more thrilling 590-hp RS version that rockets to 60 mph in less than 3.0 seconds.) It is at least as compelling as the Porsche Taycan with which it shares its platform, powertrain, and electrical architecture. And it better be, because it’s nearly as expensive too. Starting at $103,895 for the standard model and $143,895 for the RS, the e-tron GT is a costly proposition but is also one of our favorite EVs to drive.
Specifications
Base/As Tested: $103,895/$121,690
Combined Power: 522 hp
Combined Torque: 472 lb-ft
Battery: 85.0 kWh
Onboard Charger: 11.0 kW
Transmissions, F/R: direct-drive/2-speed automatic
Curb Weight: 5148 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 3.6 sec
1/4-Mile: 11.9 sec @ 119 mph
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec.
Top Speed (gov ltd): 150 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 159 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.90 g
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
• Combined: 82 MPGe
• Range: 238 mi
Lucid Air Grand Touring
We can feel it coming—oh, Lord.
Michael SimariCar and Driver
Lucid may be the new kid, but the brand doesn’t lack confidence. Its leadoff effort, the Air sedan, is a six-figure moonshot that vaults to the front of the pack in the key metrics of range and power. Lucid went so far as to design its own diminutive but potent electric motors and energy-dense battery pack. This newbie wraps that sophisticated engineering in a smoothly attractive exterior. The neat-looking interior is a step up from Tesla—although too many operations depend on touchscreens, and we were broiling under the headerless windshield and glass roof.
We’d previously wrung out the top-dog 1111-hp Dream Edition Performance model and found it to be the fastest EV we’ve ever tested, both in terms of top speed, where it reached 173 mph, and at the charger, where it gulped electrons at an average rate of 135 kilowatts (and a peak of 297 kilowatts). For this competition, we had the 819-hp Grand Touring, and it hit the same Vmax and achieved a 60-mph time of 3.0 seconds and a 410-mile range at a steady 75 mph (the EPA estimates a 516-mile range).
Those are some impressive numbers. But we were also mindful of this number: $140,500, the lofty as-tested price of our Grand Touring model, which suffered a few squeaks, creaks, and some powertrain whine. Lucid plans to add more accessible Air variants, such as the upcoming $89,050 Pure version, and we eagerly anticipate having one at next year’s EV of the Year competition. This is one EV startup whose swagger seems to be justified.
Specifications
Base/As Tested: $140,500/$140,500
Combined Power: 819 hp
Combined Torque: 885 lb-ft
Battery: 112.0 kWh
Onboard Charger: 19.2 kW
Transmissions: direct-drive
Curb Weight: 5212 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 3.0 sec
1/4-Mile: 10.7 sec @ 132 mph
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec.
Top Speed (gov ltd): 173 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 193 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.82 g
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
• Combined: 131 MPGe
• Range: 516 mi
GMC Hummer EV Pickup
Big-truck energy.
Andi HedrickCar and Driver
The thing to keep in mind about the GMC Hummer EV is that this is all intentional. Yes, GM’s first electric pickup is a 1000-hp Hummer that looks one step removed from Monster Jam, and that is a very deliberate strategy to change the conversation around EVs. If you bought a first-generation Nissan Leaf and think the Hummer EV is dumb, well, of course it is! It’s not for you. It’s for people who drive lifted one-ton Duramax duallies and think electric cars have 50 horsepower and are made of kelp. If the Hummer EV attained sentience, the first thing it would do is smash through your fence to ask if you’ve got a spare Monster Energy decal.
When you floor the Hummer EV, the ass end squats and the steering goes light as damn near five tons of truck does its best Cigarette-boat impression, prompting involuntary profanity. It seats five, which it would describe as two and a half Insane Clown Posses. Along with all else, we’re quite sure this represents the first pairing of 35-inch tires with blue-tinted T-tops. We suspect GM started with a mood board that featured Top Fuel dragsters, double-neck electric guitars, and the cast of Duck Dynasty.
The Hummer EV is an exotic, the same way a McLaren or a Ferrari is. GM will get around to building more reasonable electric trucks, sure, but for now this is a billboard pointed straight at the Trucks Gone Wild crowd, inviting all of them to get onboard with the EV revolution. Or else.
Specifications
Base/As Tested: $110,295/$118,039
Combined Power: 1000 hp
Combined Torque: 1200 lb-ft
Battery: 212.7 kWh
Onboard Charger: 11.5 kW
Transmissions: direct-drive
Curb Weight: 9640 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 3.3 sec
1/4-Mile: 11.9 sec @ 106 mph
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec.
Top Speed (gov ltd): 106 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 211 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.73 g
Genesis GV60 Performance
This buzzworthy EV has plenty to talk about.
Michael SimariCar and Driver
Genesis gave its first EV, the GV60, a lot for people to take in. From the biometric scanners on the B-pillar and dash to the crystal-ball mechanism that rotates to reveal a shift dial, the GV60 is a great conversation starter. Beneath its fashionably funky exterior, its beautifully crafted cabin, dotted with tech and smart ergonomics, helps it feel more upscale than its tidy footprint and $59,985 starting point suggest. Spend close to $70K for the 483-hp Performance AWD model (a step up from the 314-hp Advanced AWD trim) and the GV60 rips to 60 mph in 3.7 seconds. Your preferred amount of regenerative braking (or none at all) is a tap of a steering-wheel paddle away. Likewise, you can channel Space Invaders to anechoic chambers with an array of sound profiles.
The GV60’s road manners make it more cruiser than stormer. The EPA pegs it at either 235 or 248 miles per charge, depending on trim. More impressively, the 800-volt electronics enable the 77.4-kWh battery to charge extremely quickly. There are a few demerits: The back seat is tight, Apple CarPlay requires a cord, and the rear suspension occasionally feels unsettled when driven hard. Perhaps the car’s greatest challenge will come from its Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Kia EV6 platform-mates, both of which cost significantly less. But the GV60 does exactly what it should for a newish brand like Genesis: create buzz.
Specifications
Base/As Tested: $68,985/$69,560
Combined Power: 483 hp
Combined Torque: 516 lb-ft
Battery: 77.4 kWh
Onboard Charger: 10.9 kW
Transmissions: direct-drive
Curb Weight: 4862 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 3.7 sec
1/4-Mile: 12.2 sec @ 112 mph
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec.
Top Speed (gov ltd): 151 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 180 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.83 g
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
• Combined: 90 MPGe
• Range: 235 mi
Mercedes-AMG EQS 4Matic+
Merc’s top electric sedan falls short of flagship status.
Michael SimariCar and Driver
In theory, the EQS ought to excite us. After all, in AMG form, this all-wheel-drive electric luxury car produces 751 horsepower, allowing it to race to 60 mph in 3.0 seconds. It’s even capable of going 290 miles at 75 mph on a full charge (the non-AMG EQS580 can go 350 miles). In practice, the most performance-oriented variant of the three-pointed-star brand’s electric hatchback left us dispirited. Yes, its build quality and interior materials far surpass those from the likes of Lucid and Tesla, but the EQS fails to mimic the cosseting characteristics of its gas-powered counterpart, the S-class.
Particularly, the EQS’s back seat lacks the grandeur we expect of a flagship model, as the car’s partially-consumed-lozenge shape puts a noticeable dent in rear-seat headroom—a trait the upright position of the three-across bench’s fixed backs exacerbates. Rather, the EQS prioritizes its cabin’s front quarters. All-wheel-drive variants have a dashboard with a trio of digital displays residing under a single 56.0-inch piece of glass. Mercedes calls this setup the Hyperscreen. It’s an impressive feature that’s hindered by its tendency to attract dust and reflect sunlight. And the EQS is not exactly rewarding to drive, even in AMG guise, as its muted controls and its brake pedal’s long travel and spongy feel fail to inspire confidence.
Mercedes put a great deal of effort into developing an electric analogue to its S-class sedan. However, the automaker’s middling execution of this concept results in the EQS being less of an equal to its gas kin and more of an understudy.
Specifications
Base/As Tested: $148,495/$159,055
Combined Power: 751 hp
Combined Torque: 752 lb-ft
Battery: 107.8 kWh
Onboard Charger: 9.6 kW
Transmissions: direct-drive
Curb Weight: 5911 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 3.0 sec
1/4-Mile: 11.4 sec @ 119 mph
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec.
Top Speed (gov ltd): 154 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 167 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.92 g
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
• Combined: 77 MPGe
• Range: 277 mi
Genesis Electrified G80
The undercover EV.
Michael SimariCar and Driver
The move to electrification granted designers a hall pass to get wild with exterior styling. But if a low-slung hood or a spaceship profile isn’t your thing, look no further than the Genesis Electrified G80.
Perhaps the greatest appeal of the Genesis brand’s latest electric offering is that unlike so many other new EVs, it isn’t a utility vehicle. It comes in a single trim level with plenty of creature comforts, including a rich leather interior. Aside from the one-piece crest grille embossed with diagonal lines to mimic the nose of the gasser G80, there’s really no telling the two apart from the front.
Out back, the omission of tailpipes is a tip-off that an electric motor at each axle has replaced the internal-combustion powertrain. Combined, they generate 365 horsepower and 516 pound-feet of torque. Activate Sport mode and the front tires lay rubber as the 5047-pound sedan leaps to 60 mph in 4.1 seconds and plows through the quarter-mile marker in 12.8 seconds at 106 mph.
On the open road, the Electrified G80 is relaxed and will travel up to 290 miles on a charge. When it’s time to juice up, recharging from 10 to 90 percent on a 350-kW DC fast-charger takes 32 minutes. When the road coils, the standard rear-axle steering and the heft of the 1204-pound battery hung low in the chassis help the Electrified G80 graciously hug an apex.
For now, Genesis will offer the Electrified G80 only in California, Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York. Eventually, it will be available across the continental U.S. as Genesis continues its push to be all electric by 2030.
Sedans, though, are a tough sell. Convincing EV shoppers to consider them could be difficult—despite how great this one is.
Specifications
Base (C/D est): $80,000
Combined Power: 365 hp
Combined Torque: 516 lb-ft
Battery: 87.2 kWh
Onboard Charger: 10.9 kW
Transmissions: direct-drive
Curb Weight: 5047 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 4.1 sec
1/4-Mile: 12.8 sec @ 106 mph
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.
Top Speed (C/D est): 150 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 184 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.90 g
EPA FUEL ECONOMY (C/D EST)
• Combined: 100 MPGe
• Range: 290 mi
BMW iX xDrive50
Why be normal?
Marc UrbanoCar and Driver
When designing an electric vehicle for 2022, you can go one of two ways: Retrofit an existing vehicle with an electric powertrain or start from scratch and create something that’s outside the norm. BMW chose the latter when developing the iX SUV. It’s delightfully unconventional, starting with the electric motors, which forgo the typical permanent magnets in favor of current-excited motors that eliminate the need for rare-earth magnets. But the iX’s design is where BMW allowed itself to go hog-wild. Although we’re divided over its exterior design, we all agree its interior design is less polarizing. And its unique approach to luxury makes this Bimmer stand out. The iX isn’t cheap, and a high-end cabin is expected when the starting price is $84,195, but the BMW looks and feels more expensive inside than pricier machines such as the Mercedes EQS and the Lucid Air. Performance is outstanding for an SUV of this size, and the 516-hp iX xDrive50 hits 60 mph in just 4.0 seconds and dispatches the quarter-mile in 12.4 seconds at 114 mph. An even more powerful M60 model is joining the lineup for 2023. EPA estimated driving range is an impressive 315 miles, and the iX’s 105.2-kWh battery charged quickly in our testing, although the Air’s battery did better. There are still some fairly conventional SUV attributes here, including a spacious rear seat and cargo area, but the things that make the iX different are what make it special.
Specifications
Base/As Tested: $84,195/$104,195
Combined Power: 516 hp
Combined Torque: 564 lb-ft
Battery: 105.2 kWh
Onboard Charger: 11.0 kW
Transmissions: direct-drive
Curb Weight: 5707 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 4.0 sec
1/4-Mile: 12.4 sec @ 114 mph
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec.
Top Speed (gov ltd): 124 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 158 ft
Braking, 100-0: 321 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.88 g
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
• Combined: 86 MPGe
• Range: 315 mi
Kia EV6 Wind AWD
Hard to define but easy to like.
Michael SimariCar and Driver
The Kia EV6 raised a vexing question the first time we laid eyes on it: Is it a car or an SUV? (Answer: Yes?) While it’s based on the same underlying architecture as the Hyundai Ioniq 5 (more clearly an SUV), its wheelbase is 3.9 inches shorter, and its overall height is 2.2 inches lower. And yet the EV6’s foreshortened cabin still has as much rear legroom and even more front legroom than the Ioniq 5’s. With identical propulsion systems to the Ioniq 5, it would seem the EV6’s hard-to-define appearance is the biggest difference between the two cars, um, SUVs, er, vehicles.
That’s certainly true of the pair’s performance. The 320-hp, two-motor, all-wheel drive models—the EV6 GT-Line and Ioniq 5 AWD—both posted all-but-identical 60-mph times and skidpad grip. Most of their other test results are equally close. The EV6 has slightly more range, which tops out at 310 miles for the two-wheel-drive model. They are priced on top of one another too.
The EV6 goes its own way with design, with a shape that looks like a race helmet on wheels, or maybe a space capsule, and an intriguing interior design rendered in mid-grade materials. The differences beyond that are more about appearance than function. Both have intuitive touchscreens, steering-wheel paddles to adjust regenerative braking, plenty of passenger room, and a suspension tune that enables lively handling while effectively filtering unruly pavement.
The EV6’s close relationship to the terrific Ioniq 5 speaks to its bona fides. Whether you think it looks like a car, an SUV, or something from planet elsewhere, it’s unquestionably an impressive EV.
Specifications
Base/As Tested: $52,195/$54,190
Combined Power: 320 hp
Combined Torque: 446 lb-ft
Battery: 77.4 kWh
Onboard Charger: 10.9 kW
Transmissions: direct-drive
Curb Weight: 4574 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 4.4 sec
1/4-Mile: 13.1 sec @ 103 mph
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.
Top Speed (gov ltd): 118 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 181 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.85 g
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
• Combined: 105 MPGe
• Range: 274 mi
Volvo C40 Recharge
It takes more than Scandinavian style to make a great EV.
Michael SimariCar and Driver
Our drive evaluations for EV of the Year are a gush of first impressions. We cycle through multiple cars each day: drive, swap, reflect, repeat. Our own Elana Scherr likened this sort of testing to automotive speed dating. And in this scenario, our gut tells us that the Volvo C40 Recharge is not a vehicle we’d want to have a long-term relationship with.
It’s not that the C40 Recharge is unattractive or initially off-putting—anything but. It’s dressed in upscale, fastback sheetmetal, and its no-leather interior has a classy, well-tailored look. But we favor cars that are fun to drive, and the C40 Recharge really isn’t. It rides stiffly, and when driven briskly on twisty roads, it feels unsettled, like a train car teetering high up over the rails.
We should like this Volvo because it’s quick—60 mph arrives in 4.3 seconds. But we actually wish it had less power; the chassis weaves nervously off the line when your right foot asks for the C40 Recharge’s full 402 horsepower and 486 pound-feet of torque. Its 226-mile EPA range is one of the stingiest in the EV segment, its glass roof has no sunshade, and its Google-based infotainment system doesn’t seem like much of an improvement over Volvo’s previous-generation iteration.
The world of EVs is evolving rapidly. It doesn’t take much more than a brief conversation with the C40 Recharge to determine that there are better prospects available.
Specifications
Base/As Tested: $59,845/$60,540
Combined Power: 402 hp
Combined Torque: 486 lb-ft
Battery: 75.0 kWh
Onboard Charger: 11.0 kW
Transmissions: direct-drive
Curb Weight: 4763 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 4.3 sec
1/4-Mile: 12.9 sec @ 108 mph
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.
Top Speed (gov ltd): 115 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 178 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.82 g
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
• Combined: 87 MPGe
• Range: 226 mi
Tesla Model S Plaid
Beyond ludicrous.
Marc UrbanoCar and Driver
Tesla’s gone Plaid, which is why it was incumbent upon us to include the 1020-hp variant of the automaker’s revised Model S sedan. Though the Model S Plaid’s three-motor powertrain may take top billing on the Model S’s long list of updates, it’s far from the only feature that piqued our interest. Notably, the Tesla’s ergonomically challenged steering yoke drew plenty of commentary. As did the lack of column-mounted control stalks for the likes of turn signals and windshield wipers. Instead, these functions exist as touch-capacitive controls on the yoke’s spokes.
Still, the Plaid’s straight-line acceleration is an undeniable draw. Getting to 60 mph takes a mere 2.1 seconds, and the quarter-mile goes by after 9.4 ticks. Bringing the Plaid to a halt was less of a thrill, as our rented car’s brakes routinely exhibited signs of fade. In short, the Model S Plaid adds a battery-electric twist to the classic muscle-car formula.
Specifications
Base/As Tested: $131,440/$137,440
Combined Power: 1020 hp
Combined Torque: 1050 lb-ft
Battery: 99.3 kWh
Transmissions: direct-drive
Curb Weight: 4828 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 2.1 sec
1/4-Mile: 9.4 sec @ 151 mph
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec.
Top Speed (gov ltd): 162 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 150 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 1.08 g
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
• Combined: 101 MPGe
• Range: 348 mi