Strategic Limited Partners, LP may owe you up to $3,000 PER CONTACT if they ever contacted you by phone or text without your prior written consent. I’m building a class action lawsuit against them. You should join!

If you’ve been spammed (if they’ve contacted you by phone or text) or if you feel you’ve been scammed by a shady health insurance company that seems to go by many names, but somehow always leads to Strategic Limited Partners, LP, we need to have a serious conversation!
I am putting together a class of plaintiffs to take legal action this company. I already have enough plaintiffs to constitute a class, but the more plaintiffs we have, the stronger our case will be and the stronger the lesson will be for these spammers and scammers.
All that is required is that they contacted you without your prior written consent in order for you to have a legitimate claim of at least $1,500 PER CALL OR TEXT. I’m sure there are more violations of many other laws, but our attorney will navigate through those complexities.
If you requested a cancelation or refund and didn’t receive it, had your card charged after you’ve cancelled a “policy,” or have been otherwise charged without your authorization, you should contact me or leave a comment and let me send you a DM or PM or IM or whatever the heck it’s called on Reddit. You’re not just doing this for yourself. We’re doing to this to prevent someone’s grandmother from going to buy groceries and finding out that an insurance company who sold her policy last year, that she cancelled, has taken dinner off the menu one night in the future…again.
But for right now, and I mean do this RIGHT NOW! Call your bank and request the card you gave SLP be replaced! They will very likely attempt to take money from your account in the future with no prior notice and for no legitimate reason.

Then go to donotcall.gov and register your number, RIGHT NOW!
Then watch and understand this video, https://youtu.be/qs_06ew05VE

Read and research. https://www.fcc.gov/sites/default/files/tcpa-rules.pdf

Especially the following part, but there is a highly abbreviated (why the hell is that word so long?!?!) and much simpler version after the next divider.
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-

Telephone Consumer Protection Act 47 U.S.C. § 227

SEC. 227. [47 U.S.C. 227] RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT

….
(b) RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF AUTOMATED TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT.—

(1) PROHIBITIONS.—It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States, or any

person outside the United States if the recipient is within the United States—

(A) to make any call (other than a call made for emergency purposes or made

with the prior express consent of the called party) using any automatic telephone

dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice—

(i) to any emergency telephone line (including any “911” line and any

emergency line of a hospital, medical physician or service office, health

care facility, poison control center, or fire protection or law enforcement

agency);

(ii) to the telephone line of any guest room or patient room of a hospital,

health care facility, elderly home, or similar establishment; or

(iii) to any telephone number assigned to a paging service, cellular

telephone service, specialized mobile radio service, or other radio

common carrier service, or any service for which the called party is

charged for the call;

(B) to initiate any telephone call to any residential telephone line using an

artificial or prerecorded voice to deliver a message without the prior express

consent of the called party, unless the call is initiated for emergency purposes or

is exempted by rule or order by the Commission under paragraph (2)(B);

….

(3) PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION.—A person or entity may, if otherwise permitted by the

laws or rules of court of a State, bring in an appropriate court of that State—

(A) an action based on a violation of this subsection or the regulations prescribed

under this subsection to enjoin such violation,

(B) an action to recover for actual monetary loss from such a violation, or to

receive $500 in damages for each such violation, whichever is greater, or

(C) both such actions.

If the court finds that the defendant willfully or knowingly violated this

subsection or the regulations prescribed under this subsection, the court may, in

its discretion, increase the amount of the award to an amount equal to not more

than 3 times the amount available under subparagraph (B) of this paragraph.

(c) PROTECTION OF SUBSCRIBER PRIVACY RIGHTS.—

(1) RULEMAKING PROCEEDING REQUIRED.— Within 120 days after December 20, 1991,

the Commission shall initiate a rulemaking proceeding concerning the need to protect

residential telephone subscribers’ privacy rights to avoid receiving telephone solicitations

to which they object

….

(5) PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION.—A person who has received more than one telephone call

within any 12-month period by or on behalf of the same entity in violation of the

regulations prescribed under this subsection may, if otherwise permitted by the laws or

rules of court of a State bring in an appropriate court of that State—

(A) an action based on a violation of the regulations prescribed under this

subsection to enjoin such violation,

(B) an action to recover for actual monetary loss from such a violation, or to

receive up to $500 in damages for each such violation, whichever is greater, or

(C) both such actions.

It shall be an affirmative defense in any action brought under this paragraph that the

defendant has established and implemented, with due care, reasonable practices and

procedures to effectively prevent telephone solicitations in violation of the regulations

prescribed under this subsection. If the court finds that the defendant willfully or

knowingly violated the regulations prescribed under this subsection, the court may, in
its discretion, increase the amount of the award to an amount equal to not more than 3
times the amount available under subparagraph (B) of this paragraph.

-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-

In short, here’s is the conversation.

You: Hey FCC! Can you please do something about this company that’s always calling with automatic
dialers? Can you fine them or something?

FCC: Well, it would very expensive for us to go after everyone we get complaints about. It would
impossible to get to everyone and impractical to even attempt. Tell ya what! I’ll make this law
right here making it illegal for anyone to call you using an auto-dialer or prerecorded message. If
someone calls you with a prerecorded voice or automatic dialer, you can and should sue them for
$500.
If they know they did it in violation of this law, then the judge can increase the statutory damages
up to three times, to $1,500 per call or text.
Oh, and we’ll do you one better! We’ll create this database that’s totally free for you. Just place
your number on it and telemarketers will have to scrub their call lists against it every month. If
they don’t, and they contact you at least twice in any 12-month period, that’s another $500
violation, for each of the at least two calls or texts, that the court can triple if it find this violation
was committed knowingly…

…which is easy to prove in a class action lawsuit.

So, come along for the ride, boys and girls. It will cost you nothing, you may be asked to submit a few screenshots of text messages or phone records showing the numbers from which they called or texted you and maybe a phone call or zoom meeting or two. And in the end, if we win, there is a chance of a substantial judgement for everyone involved. We already have a total of hundreds of text messages and calls among our class members. Our case is strong. Come along. Show ’em what they’re doing’s wrong! If we lose, we don’t care! We’ll pull down their underwear!

Seriously guys. The only way we are going stop companies like this from violating laws at our expense is to show them that it’s just not worth it…by taking their money.

Comment and contact me to join this class of plaintiffs.