Cheap Insurance: Saving Money or Playing with Fire?

Backstory: I recently left my job with a good amount of money saved up, which I’m planning to rely on for the foreseeable future as I pursue my own ventures. Since I don’t expect many doctor visits next year and am fine paying out-of-pocket for those, my main goal is finding an affordable insurance plan that protects me against catastrophes that could deplete my savings, or even bankrupt me.

Concern: If something big goes down, I don’t want to be left with any part of the bill beyond my plan’s maximum. While the out-of-pocket maximums seem to suggest I wouldn’t pay more than about $9,000 annually, I’ve come to understand this cap only applies to the amount that my insurer agrees to. So if I were treated at an out-of-network hospital and the bill was $500,000, but my insurance valued the treatment at $300,000, I could be liable for the $200,000 difference (this is called balance billing). It seems to me then that having a wide network is crucial to avoid this scenario. Basically, I want to make sure if I end up at an ER, it is in-network and fully covered. Is my understanding on this correct? Is there anything I’m missing? Denial rates is probably another important thing to consider as well.

Options: Ambetter offers the most affordable option at $150 per month, though it has a very limited network. United’s cheapest plan will cost $300 per month, but has a much wider network. Premera, at $400 per month, seems to be the most widely accepted provider. I’ve also personally had good experiences with them.

See also  BC Graduate Employees Union Delivers Health Care Petition to Leahy's Office - The Heights

I can afford the premera plan, so should I just go with that? I want to insure myself from financial ruin, and it seems like the premera plan is the safest way to do that. Any advice or insights would be greatly appreciated.