Next stop, regulatory returns: What to expect

Next stop, regulatory returns: What to expect

Next stop, regulatory returns: What to expect | Insurance Business New Zealand

Columns

Next stop, regulatory returns: What to expect

Here are some key dates to keep in mind

Columns

By
Katrina Shanks

As we settle into the new financial advice regime, two key dates that advisers should keep in mind are July 1, 2023, when information recording for the first regulatory returns begins, and September 30, 2024, when the regulatory returns are due for the period between July 1 and June 30.

In the spirit of gaining valuable insights, on April 26 we delivered a 90-minute webinar with the FMA, featuring FMA’s Romil Ghelani, Dhasha Ratnayaka, and Lewis Pearce: if you haven’t had the chance to watch the recording yet, I strongly encourage you to do so webinar in the membership area of financialadvice.nz. In the meantime, I’d like to share some key takeaways.

What regulatory returns are for

Regulatory returns are a FAP Licence Standard Condition (Standard Condition 3). Most questions include factual information about the business and details that might have changed since the licence was granted. Other questions may seem a bit more nuanced and indirect.

As Romil explained, this is a reflection of compliance shifting from a tick-box exercise to a principle-based regime. Rather than relating directly to a compliance obligation, these questions are designed to capture the context on the size, nature and complexity of the FAP services. I think this is an important clarification, as some may not immediately understand why certain questions are asked.

See also  What your customers need to know about travel insurance

Overall, the purpose of regulatory returns is for the FMA to gain an up-to-date understanding of the sector and support their ongoing monitoring of the advice industry, identifying priorities and focus areas. Thanks to the consultation submissions, the regulator has been able to adjust the questionnaire to meet the needs of all parties. And as we move forward, it’s crucial to remember that we’re in this journey together, with a shared goal of doing good for the clients and New Zealand at large.

FMA has three key expectations

During the webinar, the FMA emphasised three key expectations when it comes to regulatory returns, which I believe are worth highlighting:


Aim for progress, not perfection: The regulator’s primary goal is to support and educate advisers. They acknowledge that this is the first time the market is going through this exercise and expect progress rather than perfection. Estimates are acceptable, reflecting the understanding that perfection is not the immediate goal.

 
Regulatory returns are not deterministic: The FMA will not target FAPs based on their answers to questions in the regulatory returns. These returns are designed to help the FMA conduct further monitoring and spot potential issues, rather than to determine breaches.

 
Engage with the FMA if unsure: FAPs are encouraged to contact both Financial Advice NZ and the FMA with any questions or concerns they may have. What’s clear is that the FMA aims to work collaboratively with FAPs, fostering a supportive and cooperative relationship. This open line of communication is vital for the ongoing success and growth of our industry.

See also  TATA AIG debuts India’s first satellite liability insurance

In a nutshell, the FMA recognises the extent of the changes, and while in time they will raise their expectations, they’re committed to allowing FAPs and advisers enough time to embed the new requirements in their businesses.

Important clarification from the FMA

During our session, the FMA talked us through each question and what is required, providing practical examples and taking the time to answer questions from attendees. That’s why I welcome everyone who hasn’t watched the webinar yet to find the recording at financialadvice.nz.

For example, they offered insights about Part 3 of the regulatory return questionnaire (Complaints). A complaint is an ‘expression of dissatisfaction’ directly relating to the financial advice provided, or the complaints process itself. So, unless a complaint is directly related to either of these, the FMA has no expectation for it to be captured.

The other important point to stress is that a complaint doesn’t have to be in writing: it could be in person, via phone, and so on. The key thing is for FAPs to document any complaints received and any actions taken. The FMA will not look purely at the number of complaints received, but what FAPs are doing to address them.

As for outsourcing, the same principle applies: if the outsourced service (e.g., catering services) doesn’t relate directly to FAP obligations and the financial advice services, it doesn’t need to be recorded. On the other hand, if it does relate to the service provided (e.g., third-party CRM system), then it will need to be recorded.

Here to help

From familiarising yourself with the requirements, through to establishing processes for collecting and maintaining the necessary information, and developing a timeline for completing the regulatory return – it’s better to be proactive in this journey. And Financial Advice NZ is here to assist you with resources webinars, and support.

See also  Two more full-partner sponsors back IBAC campaign

If you’d like to know more about our initiatives, visit financialadvice.nz and don’t hesitate to get in touch. 

Related Stories

Keep up with the latest news and events

Join our mailing list, it’s free!