How OSFI expects insurers to react to market volatility

Canada’s solvency regulator is acutely focused on the current macroeconomic environment and expects insurers to practice ‘capital conservation’ due to market volatility, a senior executive said at an industry event Thursday.

The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) also wants P&C (and life) insurers to conduct an inflation and interest rate stress test, Darrell Leadbetter, senior director of insurance and pension with OSFI, said during KPMG’s 2022 Insurance Conference.

“We have a pretty particular focus right now on financial resilience,” Leadbetter said during a regulatory fireside chat. “We expect that insurers will take a very close look at the assumptions that are embedded within their [portfolios],” and conduct an inflation and interest rate stress test.

Moderator Amit Chalam, a partner and national service line leader for governance, risk and compliance services with KPMG in Canada, asked Leadbetter about the state of the insurance industry, current views on risks, what OSFI wants insurers to do, and what is on the regulator’s agenda.

Leadbetter pointed out historical inflation scenarios may no longer be entirely appropriate, “so we have to really look at those and make sure they we’re getting appropriate assumptions and stress tests to be able to get a handle on that financial resilience for each institution.”

In 2023, OSFI will also reintroduce the standardized stress test for P&C and life insurers as it relates to inflation and interest rates, and provide parameters for insurers, he reported.

The current macroeconomic environment is creating market volatility with rising interest rates at the same time there is industry digitization and a worldwide transition to the new IFRS 17 insurance accounting standard. This is in addition to “all the broader risks that have been around for a while,” Leadbetter said.

See also A Warning to Hurricane Ian Policyholders About Loss Mitigation Versus Loss Prevention—A Sue and Labor Clause Analysis Can an insured recover costs to prevent a loss under a property insurance policy? If a loss occurs, can an insured recover the costs to reduce or mitigate damage from further damage? The answer is to read the full policy terms to make this determination. Generally, property insurance policies have terms which follow maritime and inland marine forms which require the policyholder to take steps to reduce or mitigate a previous loss and usually pay costs to do so. It is much less likely that a policy will reimburse fully for the costs to prevent a loss from occurring—but read the policy carefully. This issue involving a sue and labor provision was discussed by the Florida Supreme Court. Following prior case precedent interpreting the sue and labor clause, the court explained that: “An insured has the duty to exercise the care of a prudent, uninsured owner to protect insured property so as to minimize or prevent the loss for which the insurer would be liable. The purpose of the sue and labor clause is to reimburse the insured for those expenditures which are made primarily for the benefit of the insurer to reduce or eliminate a covered loss.” Did the sue and labor also pay for costs to prevent a loss? Not in that policy: “…Zurich correctly contends that the Sue and Labor clause in the Swire-Zurich policy is specifically applicable only after an actual loss has occurred or is occurring. Because Swire was acting to prevent a potential collapse of the building, and no actual loss had occurred, the $ 4.5 million expended by Swire is not recoverable under the policy’s Sue and Labor clause. …the policy’s Sue and Labor clause applies only in the case of an actual, covered loss. Any other conclusion would result in the Sue and Labor clause becoming the primary coverage provision of this contract without regard to the content of the contract or the coverage it was designed to provide. The reasoning suggested by Swire is certainly logical, to the effect that the preventive measures may have conferred a benefit upon the insurance company. If the Sue and Labor clause had been worded differently or if it had included language concerning the prevention of loss, the conclusion may have been different.” Hurricane Ian victims should be aware of property insurance provisions which require a policyholder to repair and take action to prevent further loss or damage. With soon to be Hurricane Nicole about to strike Florida, these provisions are important duties. Policies may also provide benefits to take these emergency and temporary repairs before the winds and rains of Hurricane Nicole cause further damage. Thought For The Day “You can never protect yourself 100%. What you do is protect yourself as much as possible and mitigate risk to an acceptable degree. You can never remove all risk.” Kevin Mitnick

Acknowledging the message about capital conservation is “probably not going to be that popular,” he pointed to the uncertainty surrounding IFRS 17 implementation and rising interest rates and inflation. OSFI is also looking at the reinsurance market on the P&C side to see if there is a withdrawal of capacity and what that means for net retentions.

On the interest rate side, while rising rates are normally good for the industry (particularly life insurers), they’re not really helpful when they go up really fast, Leadbetter said. “Gradual increases are really good for [insurers]. We’re spending a lot of time make sure that we are ready to deal with the issues.”

With rising interest rates, some insurers might think they’re getting a dividend or a bump in their capital ratio, Leadbetter said. “We’re encouraging all insurers to be conservative and prudent and think through the risks of the environment; take a look at the capital position and where they need to be in the next number of quarters.

“We don’t really know how [IFRS 17] is going to play out, we don’t know how the metrics will be read,” Leadbetter added. “So, when you’re looking at internal targets and things like that, be very conservative in that until you get some history of IFRS 17, and get a better sense of where the positioning of the macroeconomic environment [is].”

There’s also reason to believe the macroeconomic environment “might have some persistency with supply chains and things like that,” Leadbetter said. “We’re not as well-positioned from a financial resilience [standpoint] as we were for prior crises. So, we’re very focused and concerned about that and the resilience of our institutions.”

See also Replacement Cost Coverage Limited

Feature image by iStock.com/DNY59

How OSFI expects insurers to react to market volatility

How Can You Ensure Comprehensive Coverage With House Insurance?

Lessor Deemed Additional Insured and Entitled to Coverage

A Guide to Mental Health Services and Insurance in Singapore

The Work Goes On: Preserving Equitable Access to Affordable, High Quality Health Insurance in Challenging Times

Being black in the world: a tribute to pioneering South African psychologist Chabani Manganyi

If Trump puts RFK Jr in charge of health, get ready for a distorted reality, where global health suffers

How Can You Ensure Comprehensive Coverage With House Insurance?

RenRe third-party capital fees to be hit by Milton. But full-year record already beaten

More Stories

You may have missed